nvidia 730m benchmark / Review Asus Zenbook UXLA-CH Ultrabook - funduszeue.info Reviews

Nvidia 730m Benchmark

nvidia 730m benchmark

Ø
57% AdobeRGB (Argyll 3D)
61% AdobeRGB  (Argyll 3D)
% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma:

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1 Basic Pro 2)

The black value is sufficiently low:  cd/m² - when the panel is black, our measurement device barely records anything. This results in a good contrast of . This allows pictures to appear more satisfying and eases the legibility of text when there are reflections on the panel.

The sRGB color spectrum is not covered, but for most buyers this is a nonissue. The colorimeter measures significant deviations from the standard color values but the human eye will not notice these. The only detail which is easily apparent, when comparing to other displays, is the slight blue tinge. 

Outdoors use

In bright sunlight or in bright surroundings the glossy display prevents the user from comfortably working. The brightness of around cd/m² is quite high, but it cannot completely compensate for the strong reflections on the panel. As such, the user will have to adjust their seating position accordingly so as to prevent direct sunlight/lighting from falling onto the screen.

The touchscreen competition cannot offer much more than a slightly higher brightness as they all use glossy displays and have to suffer from reflections.

Viewing angles - Zenbook UXLA

IPS technology allows the Zenbook to offer amazing viewing angles. In contrast to TN panels, the viewer can see a clear image (no or slight distortions) whether they look from above, below or from the sides. However, the brightness decreases as the viewing angle rises.

The core of our test model is the popular Core iU CPU manufactured by Intel. This CPU integrates a GPU (Intel HD Graphics ) and the chipset on the same die. The model is equipped with 8 GB RAM and the storage device is a conventional hybrid solution: GB HDD with a cache SSD. The cache is supposed to accelerate frequently used applications.

For an extra Euros (~$), the Zenbook can be equipped with the Intel Core iU. A configuration with an Nvidia GeForce GT M has been announced but is currently unavailable in certain countries, which means the user will have to use the Intel graphics.

System information - Asus Zenbook UXLA-CH

The Core iU is an Intel ULV processor (Ultra Low Voltage) and is specifically designed for Ultrabooks. The TDP of 15 W (Thermal Design Power) is very low (2 W lower than the previous generation). Furthermore, the chipset and IGP (Integrated Graphics Processor) are included on the same die, thus saving power and space.

The standard clock speed of the dual-core CPU is GHz, which can be boosted to GHz using Turbo Boost.

The Cinebench R benchmark is passed by the notebook with points which places it just slightly below the Samsung ATIV Book 9 Plus (same processor) with points. The Sony Vaio Pro 13 scores a mere points despite having a stronger CPU (Intel Core iU) due to insufficient cooling.

On battery, the notebook offers the same performance and does not have to throttle the CPU to achieve a longer battery life.

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

Cinebench R CPU Multi 64Bit

Points

Cinebench R OpenGL 64Bit

fps

Help

in comparison

In everyday use, the cache SSD is clearly helpful. Tasks such as turning the laptop on/off or opening Internet Explorer are accelerated. The Zenbook requires a mere 15 seconds to turn on.

In PCMark 7, the UXLA scores 3, points. This places it far under the Samsung ATIV Book 9 Plus (4, points) which has the same CPU but also uses an SSD. The Sony Vaio Pro 13 also scores higher (4, points) as it is also equipped with an SSD. The Zenbook UXLA scores the highest in our comparison thanks to having the strongest processor and a SSD RAID system: 5, points.

PCMark 7 Score points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated points

Help

in comparison

HD Tune

Asus uses a hybrid storage device for the UXLA - a combination of a traditional HDD (Hard Disk Drive) and a mini SSD. Unfortunately for our test model, the competition is equipped with an SSD (Solid State Drive). The hybrid storage device is cheaper and offers more storage space. Unfortunately, unless it is opening a frequently used application, it will have the slow access times of a standard HDD.

The storage device of our test model is the Hitachi Travelstar Z5K HTSA7E with a capacity of GB and a slow operating speed of 5, rpm (revolutions per minute). Furthermore, the small build height of 7 mm is a must to fit into this slim case.

The SSD is a SanDisk SSD U with a 24 GB capacity - surprising, as the technical specifications promise a mere 16 GB. This storage space is not simply added to that of our HDD, but is especially reserved for frequently used applications and files, so as to open these faster.

The benchmark results are mostly from the HDD, as the cache SSD cannot be individually tested. The HD Tune benchmark records an average transfer rate of 88 MB/s which places it at the same level as other devices we have tested from the Hitachi series, which do not use an SSD.

Transfer Rate Minimum: MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum: MB/s
Transfer Rate Average: MB/s
Sequential Read: MB/s
Sequential Write: MB/s
4K QD32 Write: MB/s
Sequential Read: MB/s
Sequential Write: MB/s
Access Time Read: ms
Access Time Write: ms

The graphics chip of our test model is found integrated onto the die of our CPU: the Intel HD Graphics . This offers sufficient performance for most users and only games and other graphically demanding programs (such as CAD) cannot be run well on this IGP.

In 3DMark 11, the Zenbook scores points, placing it a little higher than the Samsung ATIV Book 9 Plus with a score of  points. The Sony Vaio Pro 13 scores  points due to weak cooling. The UXLA takes the throne with a score of 1, points. This Ultrabook is equipped with a stronger IGP: the Intel Iris Graphics

While on battery, the performance of the IGP is barely lower and in 3DMark06, the test model scores 5, points instead of 6, points.

3DMark 03 Standard points
3DMark 05 Standard points
3DMark 06 Standard Score points
3DMark Vantage P Result points
3DMark 11 Performance points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score points
3DMark Fire Strike Score points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score points

Help

in comparison

This Ultrabook is not aimed at gamers. The hardware is far too weak to run anything but less-demanding games or older games at low resolutions. The native resolution (Full HD) cannot be used, even for those less-demanding games, as it usually exhausts the IGP. For example, F1  can be run at an average of 33 fps and a minimum of 30 fps in Full HD. However, for this to happen, the graphics settings must all be set to minimum.

System Noise

The cooler fan works very quietly and is barely noticeable. However, the storage device can prove to be disturbing due to its infrequent bursts of noise. These are limited to  dB(A), which is relatively quiet, but the erratic behavior of the HDD means that they are noticeable. The competition is better off thanks to their silent SSDs.

The fan can reach a max of 35 dB(A), which is still quite low (stress test).

Noise Level

Idle

30 / 30 / dB(A)

HDD dB(A)
Load / dB(A)
 red to green bar
 

 

30 dB
silent

40 dB(A)
audible

50 dB(A)
loud

 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Voltcraft sl (15 cm distance)

While idle, the temperatures stay at a max 30 °C and are thus relatively cool. After the stress test, the middle region of the keyboard rises to  °C. This is warm, but not too hot. The bottom of the notebook stays below 40 °C - exemplary.

  °C
82 F
34 °C
93 F
35 °C
95 F
 
  °C
83 F
°C
99 F
°C
91 F
 
 28 °C
82 F
°C
80 F
°C
84 F
 
Maximum: °C = 99 F
Average: 31 °C = 88 F
34 °C
93 F
°C
F
°C
88 F
°C
90 F
°C
96 F
°C
88 F
°C
84 F
°C
87 F
°C
85 F
Maximum: °C = F
Average: °C = 91 F

Power Supply (max.)  °C = F

DirectX 12'yi Destekleyen Nvidia Ekran Kartları

Mobil GPU'lar

SeriDestekleyen GPU'lar Serisi (Maxwell/Kepler*)GTX M, GTX M, GTX M, GTX M, GTX M, M, M, M*, M* Serisi (Maxwell/Kepler*/Fermi**)GTX M*, GTX M*, GTX M, GTX M, M, M, M*, M** Serisi (Kepler)GTX M, GTX M, GTX M, GTX M, GTX M, GT M, GT M, GT M, GT M, GT M, GT M, GT M, GT M Serisi (Kepler/Fermi*)GTX MX, GTX M, GT M LE, GT M, GT M*, GT M*,  Serisi (Fermi)GTX M, GT M, GT M, GT M, GT M, GT MX, GT M, Serisi (Fermi)GTX M, GTX M, GTX M, GTX M, GT M,  GT M, GT M, GT M, M

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

NVIDIA GeForce GT M orta sınıf DirectX uyumlu mobil grafik kartı. GeForce GT M tabanlı olup, biraz daha yüksek saat hızına sahip. Ufak güncellemelerden ötürü biraz daha düşük güç tüketimine sahip.

Mimari

Kepler mimarisi ilk olarak GeForce M serisi ile ortaya çıkıp, Fermi mimarisinin halefi olarak gösterilmekte. GK Kepler çekirdeği SMX adı verilen 2 shader bloğu ile gelmekte ve bunlar ana çekirdek ile aynı saat hızına sahipFermi tasarımına kıyasla Kepler mimarisinde daha fazla çekirdeğin kullanılabilir olmasına karşın, Kepler çekirdeklerinin iki kata kadar güç tüketimi yönünden verimli olduğu söylenebilir. Ancak shader alanında yer alan bir modülün eksikliğinden dolayı 2 Kepler çekirdeği benzer 1 Fermi çekirdeği ile aynı hıza sahip olmakta. PCIe mobil Kepler ile artık desteklenirlen, opsiyonel Turbo modu ile kart soğutma sistemine göre %15 oranında overclock edilebilmekte. Turbo modunun aktivasyonu BIOS üzerinden yapılmakta ve uygulaması üreticiye göre değişmekte.

Performans

GeForce GT M DDR3 VRAM ile gelmekte ve saat hızına bağlı olmakla beraber oyun performansı ortalamada GT M/GT M ile aynı olacaktır. Bu yüzden performans gerektiren oyunlar x çözünürlük ve orta ayarlarda oynanabilir. Daha az performans gerektiren oyunlar ise daha yüksek detaylarda çalışacaktır.

Özellikler

Geliştirilen özellik seti artık 4 aktif ekrana kadar destek vermekte. Dahası x piksel ekran çözünürlüğü de DisplayPort veya HDMI a ile destekleniioyr. Dolby TrueHD ve DTS-HD gibi codecler HDMI çıkışından aktarılabilmekte. Ancak çoğu laptopla Optimus olacağından dahili grafik kartı ekran çıkışlarının direkt kontrolüne sahip olup Nvidia Kepler kartların sunduğu özellikleri limitleyecektir.

5. jenerasyon PureVideo HD (VP5) işlemcisi de aynı zamanda GK çekirdeğine entegre edilmiş olup, HD videoların donanımsal işlemesine olanak sağlamakta. MPEG-1/2, MPEG-4 ASP, H ve VC1/WMV9 gibi genel codecler tam olarak desteklenmekte. Resim içinde resim özelliği için 2 yayın eş zamanlı işlenebilmekte. Diğer güzel bir özellik ise Intel QuickSync benzeri harici video işleme motorunun bulunması.

GeForce GT M grafik kartının güç tüketimi GT M ile benzer veya biraz daha az olacaktır. Kart 14 inç ve üstü laptoplarda kullanılabilir.

GeForce GT M Seri

MimariKepler
Pipelines - birleştirilmiş
Çekirdek Hızı MHz
Bellek Hızı - MHz
Memory Bus genişliği64/ Bit
Bellek türüDDR3
Max. Belek Boyutu4 GB
Paylaşımlı bellekhayır
APIDirectX 11, Shader
teknoloji28 nm
ÖzelliklerOptimus, PhysX, Verde Drivers, CUDA, 3D Vision, 3DTV Play
Notebook Boyutuorta boyutlu
Duyurulma Tarihi

benchmarklar

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy

pt (3%)

AMD Radeon HD

%

AMD Radeon HD G + HD M Dual Graphics

-3%

NVIDIA Quadro KM

-3%

AMD Radeon R7 M

-3%

Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

-3%

AMD Radeon HD G + HD M Dual Graphics

-2%

NVIDIA Quadro MM

-1%

AMD Radeon HD M

-1%

AMD FirePro WM

-1%

AMD Radeon R7 M

-1%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

AMD Radeon R7 M

0%

Intel HD Graphics

0%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

1%

NVIDIA Quadro M

1%

AMD Radeon HD G

2%

NVIDIA GeForce M

2%

Intel HD Graphics

2%

AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

3%

AMD Radeon HD G + HD M Dual Graphics

4%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX Laptop GPU

%

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics

Points (11%)

+ 1 Daha fazla detay- 1 Daha fazla detay   + Karşılaştırma tablosunu göster- Karşılaştırma tablosunu gizle

AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

%

AMD Radeon

%

Intel HD Graphics

%

Qualcomm Adreno

-9%

Intel HD Graphics

-7%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

-7%

AMD Radeon R7 M

-4%

Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)

-4%

AMD Radeon R7 MDX

0%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

AMD Radeon R7 M

1%

Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

1%

Intel UHD Graphics

2%

Intel Iris Graphics

3%

NVIDIA GeForce M

4%

AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen /)

9%

Intel HD Graphics

10%

AMD Radeon RX (Laptop)

11%

Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

12%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX Laptop GPU

%

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics

Points (6%)

+ 1 Daha fazla detay- 1 Daha fazla detay   + Karşılaştırma tablosunu göster- Karşılaştırma tablosunu gizle

AMD Radeon R7 M

-5%

Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

-4%

Intel UHD Graphics

-3%

NVIDIA GeForce M

-3%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

-3%

AMD Radeon R7 M

-2%

AMD Radeon R9 M

-1%

NVIDIA GeForce MX

-1%

NVIDIA GeForce MX

0%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

AMD Radeon R7 M

1%

AMD Radeon HD G

2%

AMD Radeon RX X (Laptop)

2%

AMD Radeon HD G

2%

AMD Radeon Pro WX

2%

Intel UHD Graphics

4%

Intel Iris Graphics

5%

Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

6%

NVIDIA Quadro RTX Max-Q

7%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX Laptop GPU

%

3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score

min:      avg:      median: (6%)     max: Points

+ 8 Daha fazla detay- 8 Daha fazla detay   + Karşılaştırma tablosunu göster- Karşılaştırma tablosunu gizle

NVIDIA GeForce M

-7%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

-5%

AMD Radeon R9 M

-3%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

-3%

AMD Radeon R8 MDX

-2%

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

-2%

Intel HD Graphics

-2%

NVIDIA GeForce M

-1%

Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

0%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

AMD Radeon HD M

1%

AMD Radeon R9 M

1%

NVIDIA GeForce M

2%

AMD Radeon R7 MDX

2%

Intel HD Graphics

3%

NVIDIA Quadro KM

3%

AMD Radeon HD M

4%

AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

4%

Intel Iris Graphics

5%

AMD Radeon RX M

%

3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics

min:      avg:      median: (4%)     max: Points

+ 8 Daha fazla detay- 8 Daha fazla detay   + Karşılaştırma tablosunu göster- Karşılaştırma tablosunu gizle

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

%

AMD Radeon R7 M

-7%

AMD Radeon R6 MDX

-6%

Intel UHD Graphics

-5%

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

-4%

NVIDIA GeForce M

-4%

NVIDIA GeForce M

-3%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

-2%

AMD Radeon HD M

-1%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

Intel HD Graphics

1%

Intel Iris Graphics

2%

Intel HD Graphics

2%

Intel HD Graphics

2%

Intel HD Graphics

3%

AMD Radeon HD M

4%

AMD Radeon R7 M

5%

AMD Radeon HD M

6%

NVIDIA GeForce M

6%

AMD Radeon RX M XT

%

3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score

min:      avg:      median: (0%)     max: Points

+ 9 Daha fazla detay- 9 Daha fazla detay   + Karşılaştırma tablosunu göster- Karşılaştırma tablosunu gizle

Intel HD Graphics

-9%

NVIDIA GeForce M

-9%

AMD Radeon HD M

-8%

AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)

-6%

Intel HD Graphics

-5%

AMD Radeon R7 M

-4%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

-4%

AMD Radeon R5 M

-2%

AMD Radeon R7 (Carrizo)

0%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

AMD Radeon R7 M

2%

AMD Radeon R7 (Kaveri)

4%

Intel HD Graphics P

4%

NVIDIA Quadro KM

4%

AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

4%

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)

5%

NVIDIA GeForce M

5%

NVIDIA GeForce M

5%

AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

6%

AMD Radeon RX M XT

%

3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics

min:      avg:      median: (3%)     max: Points

+ 9 Daha fazla detay- 9 Daha fazla detay   + Karşılaştırma tablosunu göster- Karşılaştırma tablosunu gizle

AMD Radeon HD

%

Intel HD Graphics

-7%

Intel UHD Graphics

-6%

AMD Radeon R5 (Carrizo)

-6%

AMD Radeon R5 M

-6%

NVIDIA GeForce M

-4%

NVIDIA Quadro KM

-2%

AMD Radeon HD M

-1%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

-1%

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

-1%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

AMD Radeon R7 M

1%

AMD Radeon R5 M

1%

AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)

2%

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)

4%

AMD Radeon R7 (Carrizo)

4%

AMD Radeon R6 MDX

5%

AMD Radeon R7 M

7%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

8%

NVIDIA GeForce M

8%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX SLI (Laptop)

%

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics

min:      avg:      median: (7%)     max: Points

+ 8 Daha fazla detay- 8 Daha fazla detay   + Karşılaştırma tablosunu göster- Karşılaştırma tablosunu gizle

NVIDIA Quadro P

-3%

NVIDIA GeForce M

-3%

NVIDIA GeForce M

-3%

NVIDIA GeForce M

-2%

NVIDIA GeForce MX

-2%

NVIDIA GeForce MX

-2%

AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

-1%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

-1%

AMD Radeon HD G + HD M Dual Graphics

0%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

1%

NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book

1%

AMD Radeon R8 MDX

2%

Intel HD Graphics

2%

AMD Radeon RX X (Laptop)

2%

ATI Mobility Radeon HD

2%

AMD Radeon HD M

2%

AMD Radeon HD G

3%

AMD Radeon HD M

4%

AMD Radeon RX S

%

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score

min:      avg:      median: (5%)     max: Points

+ 7 Daha fazla detay- 7 Daha fazla detay   + Karşılaştırma tablosunu göster- Karşılaştırma tablosunu gizle

NVIDIA GeForce M

-4%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX M

-3%

AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

-2%

AMD Radeon R5 M

-2%

Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

-2%

Qualcomm Adreno

-1%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

-1%

AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)

0%

NVIDIA GeForce M

0%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

0%

AMD Radeon HD G + HD M Dual Graphics

0%

AMD Radeon HD M

1%

AMD Radeon R5 M

1%

AMD FirePro M

3%

Intel HD Graphics

3%

Intel UHD Graphics

4%

AMD Radeon M

4%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

4%

AMD Radeon RX M XT

%

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU

min:      avg:      median: (3%)     max: Points

+ 7 Daha fazla detay- 7 Daha fazla detay   + Karşılaştırma tablosunu göster- Karşılaştırma tablosunu gizle

Intel HD Graphics

-3%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

-2%

AMD Radeon M

-2%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

-2%

AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

-2%

NVIDIA GeForce M

-2%

AMD Radeon R5 (Carrizo)

-2%

AMD FirePro M

-1%

AMD Radeon R7 (Kaveri)

0%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

Intel UHD Graphics

0%

AMD Radeon HD M

0%

Intel UHD Graphics

0%

NVIDIA GeForce M

1%

AMD Radeon R5 M

2%

Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

3%

AMD Radeon R7 (Carrizo)

3%

NVIDIA Quadro KM

4%

NVIDIA Quadro KM

4%

AMD Radeon RX M XT

%

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +

3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total

min:      avg:      median: (2%)     max: Points

+ 6 Daha fazla detay- 6 Daha fazla detay   + Karşılaştırma tablosunu göster- Karşılaştırma tablosunu gizle

Intel HD Graphics

-5%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

-4%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX M

-4%

Intel Iris Graphics

-3%

Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

-3%

ATI FirePro M

-2%

ATI Mobility Radeon HD

-2%

NVIDIA Quadro M

-2%

AMD Radeon R7 M

-1%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

AMD Radeon R8 MDX

1%

AMD Radeon R7 M

2%

ATI Mobility Radeon HD X2

2%

AMD Radeon HD M

2%

NVIDIA Quadro FX M

3%

NVIDIA Quadro KM

3%

AMD Radeon R8 MDX

3%

AMD Radeon HD M XT

4%

AMD Radeon HD M

4%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX Laptop GPU

%

3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +

3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX

min:      avg:      median: (5%)     max: Points

+ 6 Daha fazla detay- 6 Daha fazla detay   + Karşılaştırma tablosunu göster- Karşılaştırma tablosunu gizle

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

-4%

AMD Radeon HD M

-3%

AMD Radeon HD M

-2%

ATI FirePro M

-2%

NVIDIA Quadro FX M

-1%

Intel UHD Graphics

-1%

NVIDIA GeForce M

-1%

AMD Radeon HD G + HD M Dual Graphics

0%

AMD Radeon R7 M

0%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

NVIDIA GeForce M GTX SLI

0%

AMD Radeon R7 M

0%

AMD Radeon R7 M

1%

Intel UHD Graphics

2%

ATI Mobility Radeon HD

3%

Intel HD Graphics

4%

NVIDIA GeForce M GTS SLI

6%

AMD Radeon HD G + HD M Dual Graphics

7%

AMD Radeon HD M

8%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX Laptop GPU

%

3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard

Points (15%)

+ 1 Daha fazla detay- 1 Daha fazla detay   + Karşılaştırma tablosunu göster- Karşılaştırma tablosunu gizle

ModelCPUGrafik kartıRAMDeğer
Medion Akoya SampleMGeForce GT M /  MHz 2 GB 8 GB

VIA S3 Graphics ProSavage8

50 %

AMD Radeon HD M

-7%

NVIDIA GeForce M GS

-7%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

-7%

NVIDIA Quadro FX M

-6%

AMD Radeon HD M

-5%

AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

-3%

AMD Radeon HD M

-3%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

-2%

NVIDIA GeForce MX

-1%

NVIDIA GeForce GT M

ATI Mobility Radeon HD

0%

ATI Mobility Radeon HD

2%

nest...

çamaşır makinesi ses çıkarması topuz modelleri kapalı huawei hoparlör cızırtı hususi otomobil fiat doblo kurbağalıdere parkı ecele sitem melih gokcek jelibon 9 sınıf 2 dönem 2 yazılı almanca 150 rakı fiyatı 2020 parkour 2d en iyi uçlu kalem markası hangisi doğduğun gün ayın görüntüsü hey ram vasundhara das istanbul anadolu 20 icra dairesi iletişim silifke anamur otobüs grinin 50 tonu türkçe altyazılı bir peri masalı 6. bölüm izle sarayönü imsakiye hamile birinin ruyada bebek emzirdigini gormek eşkiya dünyaya hükümdar olmaz 29 bölüm atv emirgan sahili bordo bereli vs sat akbulut inşaat pendik satılık daire atlas park avm mağazalar bursa erenler hava durumu galleria avm kuaför bandırma edirne arası kaç km prof dr ali akyüz kimdir venom zehirli öfke türkçe dublaj izle 2018 indir a101 cafex kahve beyazlatıcı rize 3 asliye hukuk mahkemesi münazara hakkında bilgi 120 milyon doz diyanet mahrem açıklaması honda cr v modifiye aksesuarları ören örtur evleri iyi akşamlar elle abiye ayakkabı ekmek paparası nasıl yapılır tekirdağ çerkezköy 3 zırhlı tugay dört elle sarılmak anlamı sarayhan çiftehan otel bolu ocakbaşı iletişim kumaş ne ile yapışır başak kar maydonoz destesiyem mp3 indir eklips 3 in 1 fırça seti prof cüneyt özek istanbul kütahya yol güzergahı aski memnu soundtrack selçuk psikoloji taban puanları senfonilerle ilahiler adana mut otobüs gülben ergen hürrem rüyada sakız görmek diyanet pupui petek dinçöz mat ruj tenvin harfleri istanbul kocaeli haritası kolay starbucks kurabiyesi 10 sınıf polinom test pdf arçelik tezgah üstü su arıtma cihazı fiyatları şafi mezhebi cuma namazı nasıl kılınır ruhsal bozukluk için dua pvc iç kapı fiyatları işcep kartsız para çekme vga scart çevirici duyarsızlık sözleri samsung whatsapp konuşarak yazma palio şanzıman arızası